Church Of Monero: Enough is enough - How the leader of the Church tried to fool the community to make look like the Church is organizing the Monero Konferenco and even adding his own Monero address on the flyer (166 points, 268 comments)
[URGENT]Call for translators! - We have two days to submit as many translations as possible for the next release of the GUI wallet! We need your help! (123 points, 46 comments)
Monero translators, we need you to make one final sprint! The code freeze is imminent. (112 points, 15 comments)
I tell a lot of people about Monero who don't know anything about crypto and they instantly get it. They ask me the same thing over and over, so why do people still use Bitcoin? (127 points, 119 comments)
How trustyworthy is the Cake wallet for iOS? (80 points, 43 comments)
Why don't other coin devs like talking about fungibility? They seem to shrug it off even though it's a necessary component to being a currency. (77 points, 85 comments)
Purchasing Bitcoins in Norway just got 10 times easier
The biggest norwegian bank (DNB) have an app called Vipps, which allows transferring money to anyone in Norway, just knowing their phone number. Recently they added support to pay businesses. Yesterday I got an email from bitcoinsnorway.com, telling me they now support payments through Vipps. So I can get Bitcoin on my account just like this: http://i.imgur.com/qOvFpkb.png This is pretty awesome. Vipps got a lot of users too (about 27% of the norwegian population). If only Bitcoin was more popular here :/
Merck – The drugmaker earned an adjusted $1.11 per share for the third quarter, beating estimates by eight cents a share. Revenue did fall short of forecast, however. Merck reported a nearly tripling of sales for its cancer drug Keytruda, but also said a cyberattack during the quarter impacted its overall revenue.
J.C. Penney – The retailer cut its full-year forecast as it accelerates a revamping of its inventory, particularly in the women's department. It said that effort is already resulting in improved performance.
AbbVie – The drugmaker reported adjusted quarterly profit of $1.41 per share, three cents a share above estimates. Revenue was in line with expectations. The company also increased its quarterly dividend to 71 cents from 64 cents, a jump of 11 percent, and boosted its forecast for sales of its key rheumatoid arthritis drug Humira.
Colgate-Palmolive – The consumer products maker matched estimates with adjusted quarterly profit of 73 cents per share, while revenue beat forecasts. The company also raised its projected charges related to its restructuring program.
Amazon.com — Amazon reported quarterly profit of 52 cents per share, compared to the consensus estimate of three cents a share. The online retailer also saw revenue top forecasts, thanks in part to a very successful "Prime Day" as well as increased sales from the acquisition of Whole Foods earlier this year.
Alphabet – The Google parent came in well above the consensus estimate of $8.33 per share, reporting quarterly profit of $9.57 per share. The Google parent's revenue also came in above Street forecasts, with stronger-than-expected ad sales and bigger profit margins among the factors helping the bottom line.
Microsoft – Microsoft beat estimates by 12 cents with quarterly earnings of 84 cents per share, with revenue scoring a beat, as well. Microsoft saw increased demand for its cloud computing services during the quarter.
Aetna – CVS Health has made a more than $66 billion offer for the insurer, according to Dow Jones, or more than $200 per share. The report said the two sides have been in discussions about a deal for at least two months.
Intel — Intel reported adjusted quarterly profit of $1.01 per share, 21 cents a share above estimates. The chipmaker's revenue also exceeded analyst forecasts. Intel raised its full-year outlook on improved performance by its data center business.
Gilead Sciences – Gilead came in 14 cents a share above consensus forecasts, with adjusted quarterly profit of $2.27 per share. The drugmaker's revenue also beat estimates. Gilead's quarter was driven in part by strong sales of its HIV drugs, but investors are concerned about the performance of the company's hepatitis C treatments.
Expedia – Expedia fell 11 cents a share shy of estimates, reporting quarterly profit of $2.51 per share. The travel website operator's revenue also missed forecasts. Among the factors weighing on Expedia's performance: the quarter's hurricanes, as well as a weaker-than-expected quarter for majority-owned Trivago.
Wynn Resorts – Wynn reported adjusted quarterly profit of $1.52 per share, coming in nine cents a share above estimates. Revenue beat expectations, as well. The hotel and casino operator was helped by the continuing comeback in the Macau market, among other factors.
Mattel – Mattel missed forecasts by a wide margin, as the toymaker reported adjusted quarterly profit of nine cents per share compared to the consensus estimate of 57 cents a share. It also reported a revenue miss and suspended its dividend. Mattel was hurt – as was competitor Hasbro in its own recent earnings report – by the bankruptcy protection filing of toy retailer Toys R Us.
Huntsman – Huntsman and Swiss chemical maker Clariant have called off their planned $20 billion merger following opposition from activist investors who maintained that the combination of the two chemical companies would hurt shareholder value.
Western Digital – Western Digital forecast current quarter revenue below analyst estimates, although the hard disc drive and memory chip maker did beat estimates on both the top and bottom lines for its latest quarter on strong memory chip demand and higher prices.
Deckers – Deckers said it was unsuccessful in finding a potential buyer even after the footwear maker reached out to 90 potential deal partners. The maker of Ugg boots said it would focus on boosting its performance and enhancing shareholder value.
Align Technology – Align reported quarterly profit of $1.01 per share, beating the consensus estimate of 82 cents a share. The maker of the Invisalign invisible dental brace system also saw revenue exceed forecasts, with increased Invisalign sales across all its regions.
bigbear0083 has no positions in any stocks mentioned. Reddit, moderators, and the author do not advise making investment decisions based on discussion in these posts. Analysis is not subject to validation and users take action at their own risk. bigbear0083 is an admin at the financial forums Stockaholics.net where this content was originally posted.
What is on everyone's radar for today's trading day ahead here at StockMarket?
I hope you all have an excellent trading day ahead today on this Friday, October the 27th! :)
Cryptocurrency Security Advertised On Nasdaq Involved in Massive Corruption: Swiss SA Bity, and evidence suggests along with with Slock.it and the Ethereum Foundation, used an exploit on the original Ethereum cryptocurrency to steal est. 50 million USD+
Ways to improve this document
Improve reporting agency information
Remove reporting agencies that are wrong, and do not have jurisdiction.
Add email addresses of staff of reporting/tip agencies that are right juristiction.
Make script to generate comma seperated list of email addresses in README.md
Exercise our legal rights, call for a full investigation
BOTH affected members of the community and others who are watching this massive financial crime happen, watching it actively hurting innocent people and tarnishing the reputation of all cryptocurrencies request an official investigation from our legal systems.
Who to report them to?
Switzerland Fedpol who handles corruption with non-profits
Switzerland Financial authorities that Bity SA is are registered with
Local authorities who will contact and work with Swiss authorities
I will be sending the letter at the bottom of this page, to the authorities,you can use this letter, but it is recommended that you read it, correct any errors you see, make changes, add details that were missed.
Swiss Financial & Cybercrime Authorities
Report to the three Swiss agencies.
Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA)
FINMA issued a liscense to Bity SA. Laupenstrasse 27, 3003 Bern Phone +41 31 327 91 00, Fax +41 31 327 91 01 EMAIL: [email protected]
Swiss Federal office of police actively encourages people to report corruption. They have built a special hotline, corruption they want reported includes:
"non-profit organisations (such as associations or foundations) in order to gain an unjustifiable material or immaterial advantage."
Report to Swiss Federal Policehttps://fedpol.integrityplatform.org/index.php?action=reportIncident&type=report Evidence that Ethereum has been abusing their non-profit to protect DAO assets, using Ethereum resources to promote the DAO, ignoring their mission of decentralization when unilaterally deciding to hard-fork, using the knowledge they will hard fork to trade on insider knowledge and colluding to lower the market value of other cryptocurrencies. I will be sending the letter at the bottom of this page, to the authorities,you can use this letter, but it is recommended that you read it, correct any errors you see, make changes, add details that were missed.
Price manipulation using Ethereum Foundation resources for material gain
Chat logs from leaked Ethereum Foundation chat log indicating they were colluding to control the price of competing cryptocurrency Source: https://imgur.com/a/DHexx#4I1WrPY
Failing stated mission, then using insider knowledge from internal chats to trade
Despite operating a Swiss non-profit with money raised by the community for the "mission to promote and support research, development and education to bring decentralized protocols" They instead made all the decisions centrally, in internal chats, promoted security/assets that Ethereum Foundation members owned, built on Ethereum using their non-profit. Chat log between Ethereum Foundation and Exchange Operators Source: http://pastebin.com/raw/aMKwQcHR Pull request stating that decision to implement the hard fork in the client used by roughly 95%+ would be defaulting to the option that benefited them the most financially.
"default behavior of Geth to be pro-fork as per internal discussions"
Involvement in the "White Hat Group"/"Robin Hood Group" hack that were then sold to support a cryptocurrency they created and started supporting, which they had a history of doing as seen in the Skype chat
Alex Van De Sande, or avsa on reddit and twitter, of the Swiss non-profit The Ethereum foundation is now denying any responsibility, or association, likely because of the legal fallout of recent events. But Alex was clearly involved with organizing the white hat group clearly was involved with organizing. He was seen organizing on reddit.com/ethereum as seen in the screen shot below. Source: https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*bY93URPw8UvehJXPcP2Qtg.jpeg And more reddit posts with the titles
I will be sending the letter at the bottom of this page, to the authorities,you can use this letter, but it is recommended that you read it, correct any errors you see, make changes, add details that were missed.
(1) Important Report the crime to SEC who will contact and work with Swiss authorities https://denebleo.sec.gov/TCRExternal/disclaimer.xhtml It is often better to get a list of direct email addresses to staff to get more immediate action because this crime is in progress.
Swiss non-profit Ethereum Foundation (Stiftung Ethereum) Zug, Switzerland https://ethereum.org
Alex Van De Sande
Letter for authorities
I will be sending the letter at the bottom of this page, to the authorities,you can use this letter, but it is recommended that you read it, correct any errors you see, make changes, add details that were missed. ````
Format for Petition to Intervene by Electronic Copy (Email)
Cc: Subject: Petition to Intervene & Investigate Re: Ethereum Foundation, Slock.it GBMH, and Bity SA Petition to Intervene To Whom May Concern: [I/We] respectfully request to investigate and preferably intervene in the illegal seizure of 7,000,000 original Ether by Ethereum Foundation, Slock.it GBMH, and Bity SA. Who tried to coordinate a sell of the illegally obtained original Ether to coordinate crashing the price of the original Ethereum to convince users to adopt their new version of Ethereum that has features to enable the Ethereum Foundation to change any past transaction, stop smart contracts, allow third parties to replace the code of a smart contract. Due to gross negligence of Ethereum Foundation, a non-profit promoting and trading a security created on their cryptocurrency Ethereum called DAO, collaborating with the swiss SA Bity and the German company Slock.it created a security contract and sold according to wikipedia 160,000,000 USD worth of the newly created security for the cryptocurrency Ether. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest_funded_crowdfunding_projects After being informed by security researchers a bug in the contract had been found both Bity SA and Slock.it continued to promote the security, ignoring the risk. If you look at the forum.daohub.org community you can clearly see, they see it as a security threads like "Is profit from DAO investment unlikely?" The contract they created can be found here: https://daohub.org Source: https://forum.daohub.org/t/is-profit-from-dao-investment-unlikely/1466 Source: https://blog.slock.it/no-dao-funds-at-risk-following-the-ethereum-smart-contract-recursive-call-bug-discovery-29f482d348b#.4geeq3dny Statistical analysis was done on purchasers of the DAO security, using blockchain data. It was determined "The wealthy few (top 1% of addresses) control over 55% of the voting power of proposals, while everyone who contributed 100 Ether or less (more than 66%) control barely over 2% of the total tokens." Source: https://medium.com/the-bitcoin-podcast-blog/looking-at-the-dao-address-distribution-part-1-f324e71381bf#.ivoddhx3y After the exploit was reported and disregarded by the operators an anonymous entity used the exploit to steal 1/3rd of the cryptocurrency that was used to buy the security. Worth est. 50,000,000 USD worth of Ether at the time. After the exploit was used, Vitalik Buterin, the leader of the Ethereum Foundation, trying to encourage buying said "@junseth I will provide my opinion in the way that @Truthcoin would approve of: I have been buying DAO tokens since the security news" Source: https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/741832934814949377 Anyone with knowledge in finance would immediately ask, why is the leader of a project that just had 50 million dollars worth of securities stolen, continue to buy those securities? The answer is because Vitalik Buterin had not yet announced it, but had already unilaterally decided that they would be creating a hard fork, essentially creating a new version of the Ether cryptocurrency and modifying the contract to stop it, and replace it with different code. The original Ether would still exist, but they would start a new one alongside it. Invalidating the claim on their website that Ethereum: "Ethereum is a decentralized platform that runs smart contracts: applications that run exactly as programmed without any possibility of downtime, censorship, fraud or third party interference." Source: https://ethereum.org/ Despite pretending this decision was made by the community, the entire decision process was centralized to the Ethereum Foundation internal private chats. Later it would come out with chat logs between the exchange operators after the event and even more later in pull requests from the Foundation that internal chats had decided the entire thing long before it was announced. So when Vitalik Buterin was buying DAO tokens, he had already known he would soft or hard, regardless of the stakeholders. Chat log between Ethereum Foundation and Exchange Operators You can validate the authenticity of this chat log easily by talking to the exchange operators, they operate: http://kraken.com , http://poloniex.com, http://bitfinex.comhttp://yubi.com Source: http://pastebin.com/raw/aMKwQcHR Comments on code published clearly state that decision to implement the hard fork in the client used by roughly 95%+ would be defaulting to the option that benefited them the most financially. The deciding factor it would be implemented because the majority of users do not even know how to change the setting. "default behavior of Geth to be pro-fork as per internal discussions" Source: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/2814 While they implemented this they started a back up plan where the Ethereum Foundation, Slock.it GBMH and Bity SA worked anonymously as a hacking group named "The White Hat Group" or "Robin Hood Group" (WHG or RHG). They captured 2/3rd of the Ether that was in the DAO security using the same exploit the original exploiter did. This plays a very important part later but because there was a fork, advertising efforts were made to brand the new copy of Ethereum with changes to one contract as the real Ether while many people continued to use the same Ether The Ethereum Foundation had sold them in the crowdsale. The speculated reason for breaking their system, creating an entire new one is due the massive loss taken by the 1% of DAO owners. The Ethereum Foundation actively promoted the DAO security on their blog, the inventors of Ethereum both Gavin Wood and Vitalik Buterin became "curators", claiming they would check every contract for errors making sure the DAO was secure.The Ethereum Foundation having pitched sales of the DAO to wealthy investors from the financial sector had to answer to them when the contract they were supposed to check, failed. Knowing they would lose all their instituational investment from the Financial industry they created a new Ethereum that was fundamentally different than Ethereum. Some people in the Ethereum community began to call this new version Ethereum hard fork, or ETF. This new ETF Ethereum had features that allowed the developers to change old transactions, stop applications, and allowed third parties (them) to arbitrary change out the code in a contract. This made ETF distinctly different than the Ethereum that much of the community continued using that they originally received directly from the Ethereum Foundation during the crowdsale. It did not match any of the advertising about unstoppable applications, but the original Ethereum didn't have all these new features that changed it into essentially the opposite of the description of Ethereum. So people wanting unstoppable applications, with no third party interference and censorship resistence just kept using Ethereum, trading it and building with it. Then the Ethereum Foundation, Slock.it GMBH and Bity SA used the exploit used by the hacker that led to the hard fork to get control of the 7,000,000 Ether they wrestled from the hacker before the fork. Without telling anyone they begin to launder the money. They did this by splitting the amount into smaller amounts and sending it to random addresses they created before sending it to the markets. But because it was done poorly it was quickly determined where it was going, to currency exchanges to be sold. Source: https://imgur.com/a/9X1Ce#MFyQd1e Before some exchanges managed to freeze their accounts, they had successfully sold off large amounts of the stolen ETH to buy a new asset/security that was recently created, which they hold significant portion of total security/token. Source: http://i.imgur.com/CBRclaF.jpg The "White Hat Group" moved large amounts of the original Ether to exchanges and coordinated a mass sell trying to crash the price. The goal was to crash the price and convince people still using the original Ethereum that they had no choice. Leaked Skype chat logs from the private Ethereum Foundation internal chat were leaked showing they were in fact colluding to control the price and force the community to follow the decision they unilaterly made. If all the chat logs could be obtained from Skype it would be very clear to what extent the collusion and illegal usage of the Ethereum Foundation. In the private chat of the supposedly non-profit Ethereum Foudnation Skype channel, they are seen colluding control the price of the competing original Ethereum. Chat logs from leaked Ethereum Foundation chat log indicating they were colluding to control the price of competing the original Ethereum. Source: https://imgur.com/a/DHexx#4I1WrPY In the chat logs, Jeffrey Wilcke and Fabian Vogelsteller can both be seen discussing ways to use the resources of the non-profit Ethereum Foundation to control the price of the original Ethereum and the new Ethereum. Owning significant amounts of the new Ethereum. This is not an isolated incident of Ethereum Foundation using their insider knowledge from operating the non-profit to make purchasing decisions. Vitalik Buterin of the Ethereum Foundation, shortly after the hack but before he announced there would be a hard fork announced he was buying DAO security/tokens on Twitter. This is the exact opposite of decentralized governance, depsite operating as a Swiss non-profit with money raised by the community crowd sale for the "mission to promote and support research, development and education to bring decentralized protocols". Source: http://ethereum.org There are likely more crimes actively happening but we only know of this because the currency exchange operators froze some of the "White Hat Group" accounts due to suspicious activity. This forced the "White Hat Group" to reveal themselves. It would be best to talk to Kraken.com and Poloneix.com, both exchanges who froze assets of the "White Hat Group" members after their attempts to launder and sell the cryptocurrency. Ursium on reddit is Slock.it COO Stephan Tual creator of "The DAO" security, who originally designed with the intention to fund his businesses including Slock.it. Clearly named Ethereum Foundation devs as the first people on the list of the "White Hat Group" and included his own company Slock.it. Notice the ordering, the Ethereum Foundation is the first one listed when talking about the "White Hat Group". "Bit more info: this isn't spur of the moment. A lot of people have worked around the clock for several days now to prepare for this. The community (individuals from the eth foundation, devs, security experts, ethcore, slock, etc) all came together to organize a response, which is currently ongoing." Source: https://www.reddit.com/TheDao/comments/4p60ie/we_are_doing_a_white_hat_attack_more_news_to/ Alex Van De Sande, or avsa on reddit and twitter, of the Swiss non-profit The Ethereum foundation is now denying any responsibility, or association, likely because of the legal fallout of recent events. But Alex was clearly involved with organizing the white hat group clearly was involved with organizing. He was seen organizing on reddit.com/ethereum as seen in the screen shot below. Source: https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*bY93URPw8UvehJXPcP2Qtg.jpeg And more reddit posts with the titles "We are doing a white hat attack on the DAO." by avsa. Source: https://www.reddit.com/ethereum/comments/4p5zk9/we_are_doing_a_white_hat_attack_on_the_dao/ Alex of the Swiss non-profit the Ethereum foundation even goes further on reddit, tell people specifically to not to sell the DAO security they had previously promoted heavily on the Ethereum Foundation blog. Stating is actively being hacked by them. We here could mean presumably the "White Hat Group" or the Ethereum Foundation. "We are doing a white hat attack. More news to follow. Do not panic. Do not sell." https://np.reddit.com/TheDao/comments/4p60ie/we_are_doing_a_white_hat_attack_more_news_to/ He was seen organizing on twitter.com, claiming it was "our white hat counter attack", presumably he means the "White Hat Group" but the Ethereum Foundation. And from twitter he stated during the first use of the exploit by the "White Hat Group", clearly having insider knowledge by being in the internal private Ethereum Foundation chat. "alex van de sande @avsa Jun 21 DAO IS BEING SECURELY DRAINED. DO NOT PANIC." "alex van de sande @avsa Jun 21 I repeat. There was an attack on the DAO so we launched our white hat counter attack. More updates will follow" (Emphasis is mine on 'our') What is clear by all this that the recent claims that Alex Van De Sande has nothing to do with the "White Hat Group" is an obviously lie. While there is no evidence he was active participant in the laundering or selling of the original Ether cryptocurrency for the new version in collaboration Bity SA is not clear. What is claer, is there is evidence from a leaked Ethereum Foundation skype chat that they were actively t rying to manipulate the price of the original Ethereum cryptocurrency to force investors to buy the new Ethereum they promoted. This original Ethereum cryptocurrency never stopped being used by its community, even if the Ethereum Foundation actively tried to manipulate pulbic opinion. The exact same cryptocurrency they told exchanges was worthless, was being traded for almost 2 USD per coin. This was also the exact same cryptocurrency they worked with Bity SA and Slock.it GMBH to steal millions of USD worth and dump on the market. The primary purpose of the blockchain which cryptocurrencies are built on is to prevent modificaiton of past transactions to prevent double spending. The Ethereum Foundation added the ability to modify past transactions, to stop applications and allow third party interference so they could replace the DAO code. In doing that they no longer were working on Ethereum, and Ethereum never stopped being used or valued even if they did not want it to. They got upset and then commited theft, fraud to manipulate the markets and force their centralized unilateral decision on the whole community. The Ethereum Foundation lied to exchanges, telling them no one is still using the original Ethereum network, despite massive arguments in the Ethereum forum ongoing for a month, where many people said they wanted to 'stay on the original Ethereum. One person even wrote a manifesto, convincing others that staying is the only way for Ethereum, the one they were advertised and bought in the crowd sale, could continue existing. Please start an investigation, please stop these three organizations from operating a corrupt system where they take no risks, because they can rewrite history, where they get to decide for everyone which one is "real" even if others are actively using, trading and programming the original Ethereum all along. Using an exploit to illegally seize the securities they created on the cryptocurrency Ethereum is theft. We are sending this request to you, with copies to the SEC’s distribution list for this proceeding as noted in the “cc” below. [My/Our] particular rights, duties, privileges, immunities or other substantial interests that may be affected if the SEC does not act immediately, start an investigation and work with Swiss Federal Police. Swiss Federal office of police actively encourages people to report corruption. They have built a special hotline, corruption they want reported includes: "non-profit organisations (such as associations or foundations) in order to gain an unjustifiable material or immaterial advantage." Report to Swiss Federal Police https://fedpol.integrityplatform.org/index.php?action=reportIncident&type=report Evidence that Ethereum has been abusing their non-profit for unjustifiable advantage is more than clear, as they commit massive crimes hoping the system is too complex for them to ever be investigated. Information on organization and related members: Bity SA, fomerly SBEX SA Rue des Usines 44 2000 Neuchâtel Switzerland
Alexis Roussel - Co-founder SBEX SA, Co-Founder Bity SA Gian Bochsler -Co-founder SBEX SA, Co-Founder Bity SA
Vitalik Buterin Jeffrey Wilcke Fabian Vogelsteller Alex Van De Sande
[Text of your petition.] Thank you for your consideration, of this petition. Sincerely, [Your name/s] [Attachments, if any, e.g., map, photo, etc.] ```` If you agree and feel this warrants at the very least a possible criminal investigation, you should report it.
Hey, My Name is Daniel Solem, im 27 years old and im from Norway, I’ve allways been interested in tecnology and computers, im allso a Gamer by heart and have allways been. When i first heard about bitcoin was back in 2009 just after my daughter was born, i started mining straight away, but i stopped since i didnt believe in it at the time, but i was quite interested, and had a wallet of a ... Digital money that’s instant, private, and free from bank fees. Download our official wallet app and start using Bitcoin today. Read news, start mining, and buy BTC or BCH. With virtual phone numbers you can use our apps WhatsSIM, Virtual Phone, Spoof Chat and Call Forwarder. We provide virtual numbers from many countries. You can start to receive and make phone calls as well as text messages (SMS). You can also use our Apps to register with online services such as WhatsApp or Telegram. In generally you can use it with every service that needs a mobile phone number. Cointext allows you to send bitcoin cash to anyone with a mobile phone in the regions supported by the service even if you don’t have access to the internet.On a global scale, the availability ... Most Bitcoin Ponzi Schemes today appear in the form of cloud mining sites or coin doublers. These are sites that will promise you high-rates of return on your coins on a daily basis and will disappear with your money, after a while. How to avoid – Just use the Bitcoin Scam Test on this page before investing in anything.
Ig @ morganfxm Telegram @ morganfxm Comment below let me know if your also trading/investing in Bitcoin. *Sorry I’m on my IPad, currently not at my desktop. ... Wichtiges Update zum Bitcoin vor Bullenmarkt vielleicht!? Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Share your videos with friends, family, and the world Creen que este sea un buen momento para entrar? Entonces mira este video y luego hazte la misma pregunta. 🚀Contacto para señales VIP 🚀Cursos https://t.me...